没有所谓的中间地带。

要么是资本主义，要么是社会主义，每个中间地带最终都会陷入社会主义状态。

实际上，米塞斯就是这么说的，他说只有两种制度，自由企业资本主义和社会主义。他还指出，这在哈耶克的《通往奴役之路》一书中得到了证实，任何中间方案在资本主义方面都是不稳定的，也就是说，它倾向于社会主义。

因此，当你实施干预时，会导致政府失灵，进而引发进一步的干预，这就设置了一个陷阱，导致越来越多的干预。

在这种情况下，新古典主义者的市场失灵理论实际上是在处理数学上的问题。可以说，他们非但没有让世界变得更美好，反而助长了干预的加剧。

---米莱

There's no such thing as a middle ground.

It's either capitalism or socialism, and every middle ground ends up in a state of socialism.

Well, actually, that is what Mises said, that there were, he said that there are only two systems, free enterprise capitalism and socialism. And he also pointed out, and this is proven in Hayek's book, The Road to Serfdom, that any middle ground solution is unstable in terms of capitalism, meaning it tends towards socialism.

So, when you implement an intervention, it causes government failure, which then triggers further intervention, setting up a trap that results in more and more intervention.

And in this context, the neoclassicals, with their market failure theory, are in fact dealing with problems that are fundamentally mathematical. Rather than making the world a better place, they have, if you will, been instrumental in increasing the levels of intervention.