做西方经济学研究的反动派真是层出不穷：

Jean Tirole，法国经济学家，2014年诺贝尔经济学奖，2021年在经济学顶刊AER上发了一篇文章“Digital Dystopia”，模型我就不看了，它的现实意义是什么呢？是说中国有大规模数据监控给公民打分（对就是那个臭名昭著的Social Credit System谎言），文章要研究一下这种制度怎么扭曲信号。

以下内容出自文章的forthcoming版本（没找正式版，我才不信正式版里会把这几句删掉——或者说要是没有这些内容，这文章恐怕都没有发表的价值）

The much-discussed Chinese social credit system illustrates potential problems. Due to be rolled out in 2020, it was launched in 2014 and was preceded by local experiments starting in the late 2000s. It draws its technological features from the scoring systems developed by the large tech companies. The following discussion is subject to caution, though, as the terms of social scoring are not cast in stone and current pilots may differ from the future implementation anyway. Also, this project is probably not a Chinese idiosyncrasy; while China has a technological lead in the associated technologies and a conducive political situation, social scoring will likely tempt other governments in the near future.

The social score that each individual will receive will embody a variety of criteria; these might include for example credit history, tax compliance, good deeds, environmentally friendly behavior, traffic violations, fraudulent behavior in markets, the spreading of “fake news” and the posting of “inappropriate posts” (whatever this may be interpreted as meaning), the individual’s social graph, personal traits, political or religious opinions, etc.

An individual’s social score will be publicly available (and casual evidence on the current experimentations shows that individuals with a favorable score do share it with their relationships anyway) and consequential in two ways. First, it will elicit social sanctions and stigmatization (the modern version of the pillory) as well as social rewards. Second, it will incentivize non-governmental actors to alter their customer relationships to account for the individual’s social score; for instance, a bad rating might generate restrictions on access to discounts on purchases, employment, transportation, visas abroad, or access to the best schools or universities.

注释：
5 It is interesting to note that Uyghurs in China form a strong-ties society and also face a higher cost of compliance with the government’s goals than the rest of Chinese society. There is also a political economy constraint to any repressive policy. Such policies must not create too many losers in the population; but Uygurs have little political clout (whether at home or even in Muslim countries).

最难绷的是国内还请他来讲“数字隐私”……
百度百科：
2025年，梯若尔继续活跃于中国学术舞台：7月2日，他在北京大学光华管理学院围绕“数字时代的隐私”进行分享；7月3日，在清华大学2025中国数字经济发展和治理学术年会上发表主旨演讲“数字生态系统中的公平‘守门’”。

英文部分我不翻译了，我不确定翻译之后还能不能发出来。